The “Believe” singer also addressed her anxieties about what the future for trans people will look likе in an interview with ‘The Guardian’Cher might not be “strong enough” to survive another Trump presidency.
In an interview with The Guardian released Wednesday, the “Believe” singer opened up about how “horrified” she’d feel if former President Donald Trump was once again re-elected.
“I almost got an ulcer the last time,” she told the outlet. “If he gets in, who knows? This time I will leave [the country].”The actress/musician is particularly concerned with what the future for trans people looks likе. It’s something likе 500 bills they’re trying to pass,” she told the publication. “I was with two trans girls the other night – and of course my own child [Chaz is trans]. I was saying ‘We’ve got to stand together.’ I don’t know what their eventual plan is for trans people.
I don’t put anything past them.”
Cher has been a longtime critic of the 45th president calling him a “f—ing traitor” on X (formerly known as Twitter) in 2016 and saying in a 2018 interview with The Washington Post that he had done “so much damage” to America.
The pop legend, whose birth father was Armenian, also addressed the tensions between Armenians and Azerbaijan in her conversation with The Guardian, which she has been tweeting about lately as well. She began to identify strongly with her heritage once she took a trip years ago when she visited its capital, Yerevan.
“When I got there, I thought, ‘Wow, everybody looks likе me! How could I not have strong feelings about this?’” she told the publication. The album is a 13-track project, which features collaborations with pals including Stevie Wonder and Cyndi Lauper, covers of classics likе Chuck Berry’s “Run Rudolph Run” and original tracks such as the dance-pop single “DJ Play a Christmas Song.”
My MIL Gifted Me a Set of Rules Titled ‘How to Be a Good Wife for My Son’ for Our Wedding, While My Husband Got a Check
This narrative captures a powerful journey of self-assertion and resistance against traditional expectations within a marriage. The protagonist, Lucia, experiences a significant shock when her mother-in-law, Karen, presents her with a set of archaic rules on being a “good wife” immediately after her wedding.
The contrast between Lucia’s dreams of partnership and the harsh reality imposed by Karen’s rules is striking. Initially, Lucia’s reaction is one of disbelief and confusion, but as she processes the absurdity of the list, she resolves to turn the situation around with humor and a touch of rebellion. Each action she takes, from modifying the breakfast to rearranging the kitchen, cleverly subverts Karen’s expectations while highlighting the ridiculousness of the demands.
The climax occurs when Dan finally stands up to his mother, asserting that their marriage will not be dictated by outdated norms. This moment is pivotal, illustrating the importance of communication and mutual respect in a partnership. The resolution, where Lucia and Dan embrace a future free from imposed roles, symbolizes a refreshing shift toward a more equitable relationship.
The writing skillfully balances humor with serious themes of autonomy and the rejection of outdated gender roles. It’s a compelling reminder of the importance of defining one’s own path in relationships, unencumbered by external pressures.
If you’re looking for feedback on specific aspects or help with revisions, let me know!
Leave a Reply