It has been reported by Walt Disney Studios that the sequel will open in theaters in 2025.
Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan are back together.
In a recent picture taken on the set of Freaky Friday 2, Lohan, 37, and Curtis, 65, join hands and smile more than 20 years after their first comedy came out in 2003. They switched positions and sat on the other star’s trailer’s steps.
The news, which was revealed by Walt Disney Studios on June 24, verified that the sequel is now in production and scheduled for a 2025 theatrical release.
The new movie is “in the process,” according to Lohan, who told PEOPLE in March that she was “excited to work with Jamie again and see how much further we can take it.”
We chat about it virtually every other day anyhow, so I think this will be a lot of fun,” Lohan continued.
The two costars got back together for an interview with The New York Times to celebrate Freaky Friday’s 20th anniversary, during which they talked about their “easy” friendship.
“After meeting in an office and going through the read-through, it was really game on.” Curtis remarked, “I had to let go of all control mechanisms and just let it fly. Lindsay was equally supple as I was. She has an extremely remarkable acting facility if you watch “The Parent Trap.” It was a significant task. It was a large-scale event. Our connection was also quite simple.
One morning they saw a mysterious pit forming in their garden…
As Emma James diligently mowed the front yard with her lawnmower, an unexpected discovery halted her routine, a mysterious hole in the ground. Over the course of the day, this innocuous pit expanded steadily, reaching an unexpected depth of 2 meters. Adding to the intrigue, the hole contained a peculiar surprise, weathered, rusty steps.
Although the dimensions of the pit currently preclude any person from venturing inside, authorities harbor suspicions that the unearthed tunnel beneath the James’ property might connect to a canal concealed 35 years ago.
Seeking answers, the couple reached out to the construction company responsible for erecting their home in 1984. Unfortunately, the company could not shed light on the tunnel’s destination.
Expressing her bewilderment, Emma remarked: “It’s truly perplexing, these steps leading downward, yet no indication of their purpose or a cover to conceal them. Beneath lies a mixture of cement and rusty metal. We’re eager for someone to inspect and elucidate; I’m not comfortable leaving such an enigma in my backyard”.
Despite the local council’s assertion that the tunnel leads to a drain sealed off three decades ago, skepticism lingers with the homeowners. They remain unconvinced until an official examination is conducted. Frustratingly, despite assurances from authorities, no one has undertaken the task of a thorough investigation.
The homeowners fervently hope that another cavity won’t materialize, posing a potential hazard. Reluctantly, and in the absence of concrete answers, they’ve resorted to cautionary signs to prevent any unsuspecting individuals from stumbling into the mysterious void.
The James family remains in suspense, yearning for resolution and clarity about the clandestine underground structure that has disrupted their peaceful property.
Leave a Reply