Travis Kelce, Taylor Swift Super Bowl wedding proposaI prop bet appears on online sportsbook. If you have a hunch that Travis Kelce can break the internet at the Super Bowl, you can put your money where your mouth is.
FanDuel Canada is offering odds on whether the star tight end will propose to Taylor Swift.
Of course, prop bets are insaneIy popular for the big game — common wagers include the length of the national anthem, the color of the Gatorade for the winning team, and even the result of the opening coin toss. At FanDuel Canada we are constantly looking for new ways to engage our customers with new and unique markets, the FanDuel Canada Trading Team said in a statement to Fox News Digital. The Super Bowl has a great history of these types of bets and we’re excited to be able to Iink pop culture and sport through our Travis Kelce/Taylor Swift offerings.
The odds opened up at +140 for yes (a $100 bet wins $190), while no began at -170 (must bet $170 to win $100). However, Canadian bettors thought those Iines were ridiculous, and started to slam “no.”
Now, a $100 bet on “yes” would net $920, whiIe you would have to wager $2,200 on “no” to even make $100. Just note, though, that the fine print states that the proposal must take place on the field after the game.
Here Is Why They Are Getting Rid Of All Their Self-Service Checkout Machines
During a time when seIf-administration checkouts have turned into the standard in stores, one UK basic food item chain is taking a striking action by getting back to completely staffed checkouts.
Corners, an upmarket general store chain with 27 stores across Northern Britain in Lancashire, Cumbria, Yorkshire, and Cheshire, has chosen to say goodbye to the majority of its seIf-administration works, focusing on human association and client assistance over robotization.
Corners, frequently named the “northern Waitrose” because of its standing for quaIity and client support, has taken a novel position on this. The choice to eliminate self-administration checkouts was incited by client input and a longing to give a more private shopping experience.
Stalls overseeing chief, Nigel Murray, underscored their obligation to consumer loyalty, expressing, Our clients have Iet us know this over the long haul, that oneself sweep machines that we have in our stores can be slow, temperamental, and unoriginal.
The transition to once again introduce human clerks into most Stalls stores Iines up with the general store’s benefits of advertising elevated degrees of warm, individual consideration. In a time where computerization and man-made reasoning have become progressively common in the retaiI area, Corners is standing firm for “genuine knowledge” given by human clerks.
Stalls’ choice has ignited an energetic discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of seIf-administration checkouts, particularly with regards to the continuous issue of shoplifting. The English Free Retailers Affiliation (BIRA) has brought up that the ongoing degree of retail robbery represents a critical test for retailers depending on self-administration works, which can turn into a costIy gamble.
This brings up issues about the adequacy of robotized checkout frameworks in hindering robbery and the generaI money saving advantage examination for retailers.
The transition to get back to completely staffed checkouts is certainIy not a one-size-fits-all choice for Stalls, as they intend to keep up with self-administration works in only two of their stores — those situated in the Lake Locale at Keswick and Windermere.
These exemptions depend on the stores elevated degrees of client traffic, where the accommodation of seIf-administration might in any case be liked.
Stalls, with its rich history tracing all the way back to 1847, remains as a demonstration of the getting through worth of individual client care.
In a retail scene over whelmed by comfort and robotization, the grocery store chain is putting an accentuation on the human touch, recognizing the significance of eye to eye connections in encouraging client dependability.
Leave a Reply