
Imagine a job where you get paid a whopping $130,000 just to change a single lightbulb. It sounds unbelievable, right? Well, it’s true, but there’s more to it. This unique job, known as a Tower Climber, has been making waves on social media because of its high pay and daring nature.
Tower Climbers are tasked with replacing lightbulbs on signal towers that can be over 600 meters tall. These towers are not like regular buildings—they are designed with thin metal brackets that go higher up. What’s astonishing is that climbers rely only on a safety rope as they scale these immense heights. A viral TikTok video by Science8888 shows just how thrilling and risky this job can be.
To become a Tower Climber, you need nerves of steel and no fear of heights. It takes about three hours to climb up and down these towers, and they endure winds of nearly 100 kilometers per hour at the top. Climbers must be physically fit and have a strong grip to handle the job safely.
While the TikTok video claims Tower Climbers can earn around $130,000 a year, actual salaries vary based on experience and location. Entry-level climbers might start around $17 per hour, but with more experience, they can earn up to $40 per hour or more, depending on the job market.
Despite the skepticism sparked by the high salary, reputable sources like Field Engineer and Jooble confirm the reality of this job. It’s not just about the money—it’s also about the adventure and the chance to work in breathtaking locations.
In conclusion, the Tower Climber job proves that unconventional careers can offer big rewards for those willing to take on the challenge. If you’re brave enough and love heights, this job could be your ticket to a thrilling career with a handsome paycheck. Would you dare to climb to great heights for a bright future? The choice is yours.
Felt Like I Had No Choice: Woman Refuses to Switch Plane Seats
Airlines these days often push the boundaries, with no feasible option to drive across the ocean. Overbooked flights, extra charges for standard luggage, and unusual seating configurations are all part of the modern flying experience.
One woman recently turned to the internet for advice after declining a first-class seat upgrade she had earned on a flight she had long looked forward to. She had booked the flight early and accumulated enough travel points to secure the upgrade. However, shortly after takeoff, a flight attendant asked her to move to a lower-class seat.
Flying first class isn’t always stress-free.
The woman (23F) explained that she had spent a year meticulously planning her trip to San Francisco, booking her tickets well in advance.
A month or two before her flight, the airline contacted her with the news that she would be upgraded to first class, thanks to her travel points and membership status. This was her first time flying in first class, and she was thrilled.

Before the flight, she made sure to enjoy everything the lounge had to offer, preparing for the 13-hour journey. Once on board, she settled into the comfort of first class.
However, about an hour after takeoff, a flight attendant approached her with a request: would she switch seats with a 10-year-old boy in economy so he could sit with his parents, who were in first class?
The parents had received upgrades due to their membership status, but their son hadn’t been eligible. As a result, while they enjoyed first-class seats, their son was seated in economy.
The flight attendant presented options that made it seem like moving was the only choice. She mentioned that the woman could receive another complimentary upgrade on a future flight or a full refund for the current one if she agreed to switch. The woman asked if she could remain in her seat, feeling as though she was being pressured to give it up. The attendant explained that only the woman and the boy’s parents had received upgrades, and no other first-class seats were available. Therefore, the boy would have to take her seat if he was to join his parents.
The woman reflected that in a different situation—like if first class had been overbooked or if the parents had purchased their tickets—things might have been different. However, since she had earned the upgrade through her frequent flyer status, she felt it was fair to keep her seat. The flight attendant remained polite and understanding, accepting her decision without further pressure and assuring her the issue would be handled.
The woman never saw the parents, who were seated far from her, but she did face criticism from an elderly woman next to her. The woman scolded her for allowing a child to sit alone for 13 hours. While the thought of a child flying unaccompanied for such a long time was troubling, the woman noticed the boy regularly walking up and down the aisles to visit his parents, so he wasn’t truly alone.
Now, the woman asks: AITA for refusing to switch seats, or is this what people consider being an a-hole?
Leave a Reply