Starbucks India stirred controversy and faced calls for boycotts following the release of a commercial set in India that sparked objections, particularly from the right-wing community. The company drew criticism for its latest promotional campaign, which portrayed parents meeting their transgender daughter at a Starbucks outlet.
In the video, a father initially grapples with accepting his daughter’s transition but eventually embraces it by ordering a drink for her under her new name. Starbucks India shared the video on Twitter with the caption, “Your name defines who you are – whether it’s Arpit or Arpita. At Starbucks, we love and accept you for who you are. Because being yourself means everything to us. #ItStartsWithYourName.”
The advertisement faced significant backlash, with political commentator Rukshan Fernando tweeting, “Starbucks facing backlash in India after adopting a full Bud Light approach. Introducing a mediocre US coffee brand to the market wasn’t bad enough; now they bring their woke corporate culture to the Subcontinent.”
In Starbucks India’s comment section, one user expressed dismay, stating, “It’s deeply concerning to witness the rapid erosion of cultural identity in our era. Certain liberal forces persistently normalize practices that seem to undermine our cherished traditions and values.”
Another user questioned Starbucks India’s marketing approach, commenting, “I’m a huge Starbucks fan and spend thousands of rupees in their coffee shops annually. But I can’t comprehend why @StarbucksIndia would launch a woke campaign under the guise of advertising? Can’t they just promote their coffee and service in India?”
A different comment criticized the promotion of what they deemed “immoral values,” asserting, “What are you promoting @Starbucks… Don’t endorse such cultural shifts… We don’t need any lessons on accepting such immoral values… We are Bharatvasis, and we take pride in our civilization.”
“I don’t understand why brands do this… these ads alienate huge portions of the population. Whatever happened to common-sense advertising? Videos like this alienate more customers than they attract. Literally wasting advertising dollars just to virtue signal,” expressed another disgruntled individual.
Watch the controversial ad here:
America has exported woke culture all around the globe, and Starbucks India just provided yet another example of this phenomenon. Since the end of World War II, the United States has been the global hegemon of liberalism, and many other nations have sought to mimic its cuIture.
Linda Hunt Leaves Behind A Fortune That Makes Her Family Cry
For many years, Linda Hunt, the renowned actress best known for playing Hetty Lange in the popular television series “NCIS: Los Angeles,” has been adored in the entertainment industry. Many have conjectured about the huge money she leaves behind as word of her departure spreads, reportedly bringing her family to tears.
Over the course of her multi-decade career, Hunt has amassed fortune thanks to her well-known roles in both television and movies. Hunt is well known for her Academy Award–winning role in “The Year of Living Dangerously,” where she became the first actor to win an Oscar for portraying a character of the opposite sex. This accolade goes beyond her work on “NCIS: Los Angeles.” Her long career and several awards have added a substantial amount to her net worth.
Hunt is renowned for having made astute investments throughout the years in addition to her acting salary. Her ownership of real estate and these investments have left her family with a sizeable fortune. Prestigious residences and other priceless possessions that have only risen in value over time are reportedly part of Hunt’s estate.
Her wealth is a result of both her wise financial management and her achievements in Hollywood. The fact that Hunt, who has been characterized as quiet and modest, made sure her loved ones would be well taken care of has caused her family to react emotionally as they come to terms with her legacy.
Although the precise amount of Linda Hunt’s wealth is unknown, it is obvious that her financial impact has equaled her contributions to the entertainment business. Her family’s emotional response is evidence of her influence as an actress and as a cherished family member who made careful plans for their future.
Note that details of her estate and wealth distribution may differ, and the information presented is based on broad sources and hearsay.
Please tell your friends about this article!
Leave a Reply